Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GO enrichment analysis on proteomics data #12

Open
GuangchuangYu opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

GO enrichment analysis on proteomics data #12

GuangchuangYu opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@GuangchuangYu
Copy link
Member

GuangchuangYu commented Jun 30, 2023

Most enrichment analysis tools are designed at the gene level and only support gene IDs.

The first step to performing GO analysis for proteomics data is to convert protein IDs to gene IDs and then analyze them at the gene level. This can have some harmful impacts on the results.

There is a Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/index) maintained by EBI, which provides GO annotation to the Uniprot database. If we can parse the GOA file (the format was defined in http://geneontology.org/docs/go-annotation-file-gaf-format-2.2/) to a suitable format, it is easy to perform GO enrichment analysis at the protein level with the universal interface provided by clusterProfiler.

Fortunately, the clusterProfiler package provides read.gaf() function to parse the GOA file, and the output can be directly used in enricher() and GSEA().

Here, I would ask you to compare GO enrichment results obtained at the gene level (indirectly, by converting protein IDs to gene IDs) and at the protein level (directly, by using GOA file as GO annotation).

You can use the merge_result() function to merge the results and use dotplot() to compare the results visually.

@wangzy20
Copy link

intersting task, I'm trying for it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants