You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most enrichment analysis tools are designed at the gene level and only support gene IDs.
The first step to performing GO analysis for proteomics data is to convert protein IDs to gene IDs and then analyze them at the gene level. This can have some harmful impacts on the results.
There is a Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/index) maintained by EBI, which provides GO annotation to the Uniprot database. If we can parse the GOA file (the format was defined in http://geneontology.org/docs/go-annotation-file-gaf-format-2.2/) to a suitable format, it is easy to perform GO enrichment analysis at the protein level with the universal interface provided by clusterProfiler.
Fortunately, the clusterProfiler package provides read.gaf() function to parse the GOA file, and the output can be directly used in enricher() and GSEA().
Here, I would ask you to compare GO enrichment results obtained at the gene level (indirectly, by converting protein IDs to gene IDs) and at the protein level (directly, by using GOA file as GO annotation).
You can use the merge_result() function to merge the results and use dotplot() to compare the results visually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Most enrichment analysis tools are designed at the gene level and only support gene IDs.
The first step to performing GO analysis for proteomics data is to convert protein IDs to gene IDs and then analyze them at the gene level. This can have some harmful impacts on the results.
There is a Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/index) maintained by EBI, which provides GO annotation to the Uniprot database. If we can parse the GOA file (the format was defined in http://geneontology.org/docs/go-annotation-file-gaf-format-2.2/) to a suitable format, it is easy to perform GO enrichment analysis at the protein level with the universal interface provided by
clusterProfiler
.Fortunately, the
clusterProfiler
package providesread.gaf()
function to parse the GOA file, and the output can be directly used inenricher()
andGSEA()
.Here, I would ask you to compare GO enrichment results obtained at the gene level (indirectly, by converting protein IDs to gene IDs) and at the protein level (directly, by using GOA file as GO annotation).
You can use the
merge_result()
function to merge the results and usedotplot()
to compare the results visually.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: