Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inconsistency with annotatePeak #212

Open
fanying2015 opened this issue Nov 29, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

inconsistency with annotatePeak #212

fanying2015 opened this issue Nov 29, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@fanying2015
Copy link

fanying2015 commented Nov 29, 2022

Dear GuangChuang,

Thank you for making the convenient and powerful package.

In one example I found inconsistency 'annotation' and mapped gene in the annotatepeak output. In the example attached, the peak was mapped to CAT, but in annotation, it's corresponding to an intron of gene ELF5 (ENST00000257832). When I checked the signal track, mapping to ELF5 makes more sense to me in the example.

I might have missed something. Is there anyway to map the peak to gene based on ['annotation'] column? I'm using the default priority when doing annotation. The package version I'm using is ChIPseeker_1.32.0. The genome annotation is hg38.

Many thanks!

@fanying2015
Copy link
Author

Screen Shot 2022-11-29 at 3 42 53 PM

@DengEr-1993
Copy link

DengEr-1993 commented Jun 21, 2023

Have you solved this problem ?
I also met similar problem and now I am not sure if it is cause only by this package.

I think it is better for you to tell us the session information related to all the packages except ChIPseeker. I also posted my question here yesterday.

Because there are several other packages used during "annotatepeak()". I just check them one by one.

The key is that the version I used is 1.36.0.

It works well if I use old version 1.34.1.

So I think Dr. Yu can give us some help.
Here is my new post. #221

Best,
xiangyi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants