You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
Currently, we have these thresholds in the fax-config file. Ideally, we pull this from CMT to avoid discrepancies between the simulated and processed data.
I'm not entirely sure how much sense it makes to have different DAQ and hitfinder thresholds - especially if we use a fixed noise run. Changing the thresholds only really happens due to changing noise conditions. I'm curious what others think is best in this case?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
bugSomething isn't workingenhancementNew feature or request
Currently, we have these thresholds in the fax-config file. Ideally, we pull this from CMT to avoid discrepancies between the simulated and processed data.
This adds a very tiny bit to the bias (see difference between brown and red in this plot:
https://xe1t-wiki.lngs.infn.it/lib/exe/fetch.php?cache=&media=xenon:j_angevaare:n_photon_n_pe.png
Also see this thread:
https://xenonnt.slack.com/archives/C0177G05M1P/p1653034445289369
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: