You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
In core/s2.py, the definition of drift_mean_time includes the drift_time_gate, but it is used to evaluate parameters like the diffusion, where the gate transit time should be neglected as in this conditions the electric field is very different and the diffusion constant is very different. In #235, the drift_mean_time in s2_pattern_map_diffuse does not include the transit time by the gate:
Even though the effect should be overall small, wouldn't it be better to use the drift time without the gate transit to evaluate the diffusion parameters and then add the final gate transit time in order to evaluate the time difference between S1 and S2?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In
core/s2.py
, the definition ofdrift_mean_time
includes thedrift_time_gate
, but it is used to evaluate parameters like the diffusion, where the gate transit time should be neglected as in this conditions the electric field is very different and the diffusion constant is very different. In #235, thedrift_mean_time
ins2_pattern_map_diffuse
does not include the transit time by the gate:WFSim/wfsim/core/s2.py
Line 397 in c1295aa
Even though the effect should be overall small, wouldn't it be better to use the drift time without the gate transit to evaluate the diffusion parameters and then add the final gate transit time in order to evaluate the time difference between S1 and S2?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: