Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pdb files created by PANDORA do not have a properly formatted HEADER #242

Open
DaniBodor opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DaniBodor
Copy link

DaniBodor commented Mar 30, 2023

Hi,

When trying to use DSSP4.0 on pdb files created by pandora, I ran into the issue that these files do not have a properly formatted HEADER line. See this comment.

I now used a workaround to add a header line to each file before running dssp on it, but that is not ideal.

@DarioMarzella DarioMarzella added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 31, 2023
@DarioMarzella
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @DaniBodor ,
Unfortunately, the missing header depends on MODELLER. We could add one after the creation of each model and maybe use it to store information like the ranking of the model...
I will see if we can include this in the full v2.0 release, but I am afraid you will have to use your workaround at least for a while still.

@DaniBodor
Copy link
Author

DaniBodor commented Mar 31, 2023

OK, once you do get around to it, maybe make sure it adheres fully to PDB standards: https://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/file-format-content/format33/sect1.html#Order. The other minimum requirement we need for DSSP is a CRYST1 entry.

I am not getting DSSP to work on GitHub actions (it works ok locally) on the current files and strongly suspect it has to do with this, potentially in combination with precise DSSP version (am not managing to get exact same DSSP installed in both places).

@drlemmus
Copy link

drlemmus commented Apr 3, 2023

Thank you for looking at this. DSSP still supports PDB format but is now developed with mmCIF in mind. This means that it had to become stricter in formatting requirements. At some point PDB support will be dropped, but not too soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants