-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
C. briggsae operons #255
Comments
(base) /Users/mz3/Downloads % gzcat c_briggsae.PRJNA10731.WS286.annotations.gff3.gz | grep -i operon | head |
With regard to JBrowse: all of the operons that are in the GFF are displayed in JBrowse 1 but that track hasn't been ported to JBrowse 2 yet (some "species specific" tracks haven't been done. I'm working on it this week. |
Actually what I wrote above is not correct: there are no operons in the C. briggsae JBrowse of any version (I was looking at the wrong thing). Anyway, here's why: in the elegans GFF, there are three types of operons: operon:operon but in the briggsae GFF, there is only operon:dicistronic_mRNA. I believe at some point, the operons in the briggsae GFF might have been something else (perhaps operon:operon) and I didn't catch the change. Anyway, I can update the processing and config to catch the operon:dicistronic_mRNA features. Of course, I can't speak to where the other operons in briggsae are. |
Since Magdalena said there are >1000 operons in the database for briggsae, and this paper says they identified 1100 operons (https://wormbase.org/resources/paper/WBPaper00041271) I'm guessing those the operons that are missing in the GFF. I'm going to assign to Mark as a best guess of who could likely fix this. (actually, I'm not going to assign to @markquintontulloch because I don't appear to have that authority) |
Will take a look @scottcain |
I don't know what I was on yesterday, but dicistronic mRNAs are in both JBrowse 1 and 2 on both staging (WS288) and production (WS287), eg: https://wormbase.org/tools/genome/jbrowse2/?session=share-pXhyUFLl8h&password=IuYtq Perhaps it was because "Operon" wasn't in the name of the track :-) Anyway, that at least is good news, since I don't have to track down a bug that was causing them to be overlooked. |
Multiple issues with the C. briggsae operons.
In the DB there are >1000 operons. Only 49 are dumped to the GFF. None are displayed in the JBrowse track.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: