Replies: 4 comments
-
I'm in favour of having this (and all other labelling related automations). Properly labelled issues and PRs are good indicators of repository health and a very helpful tool for both new contributors as well as changelog generators. It'll only be annoying till it becomes a habit. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am all for this suggestion. Sometimes I don't check the labels because I'm not sure what exactly I need to check for, so having this guidance will be great! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am in favor too, if the requirement is only for two labels is not a big burden and helps classify issues/PRs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This has existed for some time now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
How would folks feel about a PR check to ensure that
goal
andaspect
labels are enforced on all pull requests? It sounds potentially annoying, but also it would be really nice to ensure PRs are labeled. My feelings are mixed.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions