You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the sake of having a good overview of all our proposals, I would suggest putting the table of finished proposals inline at the top of this page rather than linked: https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals
For example, I was scanning the list and thinking.. wait, what stage is multi-value? Until I realized where it was hiding. To some extend "finished" is also a stage :) For most people not intimately familiar with our proposals it is mostly important to see what is all in the pipeline, and even "finished" proposals are not necessarily available in all implementations yet, so remain relevant there.
If ever the list of finished proposals gets crazy long the current structure would maybe make more sense, but we're in no danger of that happening any time soon.
Inactive proposals can remain a link, but I would put them at the end of the document, which would be more logical if everything is ordered by "progress"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the sake of having a good overview of all our proposals, I would suggest putting the table of finished proposals inline at the top of this page rather than linked: https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals
For example, I was scanning the list and thinking.. wait, what stage is multi-value? Until I realized where it was hiding. To some extend "finished" is also a stage :) For most people not intimately familiar with our proposals it is mostly important to see what is all in the pipeline, and even "finished" proposals are not necessarily available in all implementations yet, so remain relevant there.
If ever the list of finished proposals gets crazy long the current structure would maybe make more sense, but we're in no danger of that happening any time soon.
Inactive proposals can remain a link, but I would put them at the end of the document, which would be more logical if everything is ordered by "progress"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: