-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to handle RCP scenarios & Scenarios Convention Discussion #34
Comments
We are going to use the GCIS Scenario for this. Take away todos:
|
Scenarios are only created when used in USGCRP reports. These will be agreed-upon scenarios for use in the assessment process, so should be known ahead of time. Can be used for a sub-scenario (topic-specific projection) or comprehensive umbrella scenario. Convention for internal metadata:
In future, we probably want other fields similar to those in Dataset, namely "Date Published" and "URL". |
Other conventions:
|
Here is the link to the RCP scenarios created - https://data-stage.globalchange.gov/watch?limit=4&t=scenario for review @rasherman |
We need a convention for how publications (e.g. images) connect to RCP scenarios through provenance. Both the structure of the connection (e.g. does it require an activity or reference?) and the right semantic link need to be determined.
Amrutha should come up with the initial proposed convention for discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: