Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New NIH guidelines for Reproducible Research open a possible market #25

Open
pschloss opened this issue Aug 19, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@pschloss
Copy link
Contributor

One of the big pushes at NIH currently is to address concerns regarding the reproducibility and robustness of biomedical research. Many faculty at UM are freaking out because they don't know what this means for data analysis. Many think that R is the panacea to their concerns, yet few of them know what R is. I think this is a great opportunity for us to offer either SWC or DC workshops. Before I promise too much, I wanted to get people's thoughts on what we should offer. I had three ideas. First, I could reach out to individual department heads and ask if they'd be interested in having a workshop for their trainees where we could handle 25 learners for $1000. Second, I could reach out to the head of grants in the Med School to see whether she (or someone else in the Dean's office) would be interested in hosting 3-N workshops over the coming year for $1000 X N. Third, we offer targeted workshops to people in the Medical School community and not worry about the money or administration's support. Thoughts? I think this would be a great opportunity for us to grow and I think our integrated and community-based approach is something unique that other groups on campus do not offer.

@tkoman
Copy link

tkoman commented Aug 19, 2016

You might consider reaching out to NIH Core research centers that support
furthering NIH research. I would be happy to talk further.
Trish Koman

On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Pat Schloss [email protected] wrote:

One of the big pushes at NIH currently is to address concerns regarding the
reproducibility and robustness of biomedical research. Many faculty at UM
are freaking out because they don't know what this means for data analysis.
Many think that R is the panacea to their concerns, yet few of them know
what R is. I think this is a great opportunity for us to offer either SWC
or DC workshops. Before I promise too much, I wanted to get people's
thoughts on what we should offer. I had three ideas. First, I could reach
out to individual department heads and ask if they'd be interested in
having a workshop for their trainees where we could handle 25 learners for
$1000. Second, I could reach out to the head of grants in the Med School to
see whether she (or someone else in the Dean's office) would be interested
in hosting 3-N workshops over the coming year for $1000 X N. Third, we
offer targeted workshops to people in the Medical School community and not
worry about the money or administration's support. Thoughts? I think this
would be a great opportunity for us to grow and I think our integrated and
community-based approach is something unique that other groups on campus do
not offer.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APxgW6GPXgDn45topJ4JRSfMF9q_ppUjks5qhc-igaJpZM4JomdN
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants