You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Congratulations on finishing milestone 1! We can see you put a lot of work into this project, nice work!
Below we list some specific feedback you can use to improve your project.
We provide tick boxes for you to use in the future as you address these concerns to improve the final grade of your project.
If anything is unclear, please feel free to ask questions in this issue thread.
Submission instructions
rubric={mechanics:4}
Well done!
Section 1: Motivation and Purpose
rubric={reasoning:8,writing:2}
Well done!
Section 2: Description of the data
rubric={reasoning:8,writing:2}
proposal.md - Dataset description section: The level of description is the dataset is very general and it is not focusing in the variables that are important for the analysis. -1 reasoning
proposal.md - Dataset description section: There is not evidence data quality analysis. Are there missing values? Are these values an important percentage of the dataset?. -1 reasoning
Comments:
Your description lacks analysis of the dataset specific to your project (tasks, target group, app…).
Section 3: Research questions and usage scenarios
rubric={reasoning:12,writing:2}
proposal.md - Persona: In the persona description it is not informed what is needed to visualize from the data -3 reasoning
Comments:
The persona explains clearly what the application provides for the user but not why it is beneficial.
It is not completely matching the milestone instructions. What could be improved is the progression of steps, starting from the problem of the user that is intended to be solved by the application.
Also please note that Persona is a scenario and does not need to necessarily include all the application features.
Section 4: Description of your app & sketch
rubric={viz:10, writing:2, reasoning: 3}
Well done!
Section 5: Team work contract and collaborative documentation
rubric={reasoning:4}
Well done!
Code of Conduct
rubric={reasoning:1}
Well done!
Contribution guidelines
rubric={reasoning:1}
Well done!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Submission instructions
rubric={mechanics:4}
Well done!
Section 1: Motivation and Purpose
rubric={reasoning:8,writing:2}
Well done!
Section 2: Description of the data
rubric={reasoning:8,writing:2}
proposal.md
- Dataset description section: The level of description is the dataset is very general and it is not focusing in the variables that are important for the analysis. -1 reasoningproposal.md
- Dataset description section: There is not evidence data quality analysis. Are there missing values? Are these values an important percentage of the dataset?. -1 reasoningComments:
Section 3: Research questions and usage scenarios
rubric={reasoning:12,writing:2}
proposal.md
- Persona: In the persona description it is not informed what is needed to visualize from the data -3 reasoningComments:
Section 4: Description of your app & sketch
rubric={viz:10, writing:2, reasoning: 3}
Well done!
Section 5: Team work contract and collaborative documentation
rubric={reasoning:4}
Well done!
Code of Conduct
rubric={reasoning:1}
Well done!
Contribution guidelines
rubric={reasoning:1}
Well done!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: