-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
/
3MAK.txt
656 lines (561 loc) · 33.8 KB
/
3MAK.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
sbc-bench v0.9.1 FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 Ver2.0 (Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:31:10 -0600)
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Release: 11
Codename: bullseye
Armbian release info:
BOARD=nanopim4v2
BOARD_NAME="NanoPi M4V2"
BOARDFAMILY=rk3399
BUILD_REPOSITORY_URL=https://github.com/armbian/build
BUILD_REPOSITORY_COMMIT=d3386b548-dirty
DISTRIBUTION_CODENAME=bullseye
DISTRIBUTION_STATUS=supported
VERSION=21.08.6
LINUXFAMILY=rockchip64
ARCH=arm64
IMAGE_TYPE=stable
BOARD_TYPE=conf
INITRD_ARCH=arm64
KERNEL_IMAGE_TYPE=Image
BRANCH=current
/usr/bin/gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110
Uptime: 11:31:10 up 27 min, 1 user, load average: 1.80, 1.39, 1.00
Linux 5.10.63-rockchip64 (nanopim4v2) 01/17/22 _aarch64_ (6 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
4.05 0.00 4.85 2.57 0.00 88.52
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk1 88.09 237.88 2231.49 34921.89 388917 3648356 57095196
zram0 0.35 1.39 0.00 0.00 2272 4 0
zram1 0.95 0.43 14.97 0.00 696 24480 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3.8Gi 207Mi 3.4Gi 9.0Mi 174Mi 3.5Gi
Swap: 1.9Gi 0B 1.9Gi
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram0 partition 1978052 0 5
##########################################################################
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu3 (Cortex-A53):
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1510 (1508.952/1509.270/1508.142)
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1415 (1413.451/1412.987/1412.987)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1200 (1196.772/1196.911/1197.036)
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 1010 (1005.040/1004.258/1005.223)
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 815 (810.290/813.200/811.135)
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 600 (597.162/597.337/597.357)
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 405 (404.759/405.035/405.059)
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu4-cpu5 (Cortex-A72):
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2015 (2014.384/2014.611/2014.460)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1800 (1798.547/1798.547/1798.547)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1610 (1606.477/1606.537/1606.397)
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1415 (1414.116/1414.565/1414.286)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1200 (1198.452/1198.564/1198.258)
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 1010 (1006.300/1006.582/1006.582)
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 815 (814.573/814.422/814.473)
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 600 (598.391/598.100/598.662)
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 410 (406.631/406.484/406.563)
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on cpu0 (Cortex-A53):
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 1573.7 MB/s (2.0%)
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 1592.8 MB/s (0.6%)
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 1605.7 MB/s (0.4%)
C copy : 1645.9 MB/s (0.6%)
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1216.6 MB/s
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1450.2 MB/s (0.1%)
C 2-pass copy : 1437.5 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1036.0 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 870.7 MB/s
C fill : 7617.5 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 7621.4 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 7616.0 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 7618.4 MB/s (0.3%)
---
standard memcpy : 1644.4 MB/s
standard memset : 7651.4 MB/s (0.3%)
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 1676.1 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 1121.9 MB/s (0.7%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 1412.8 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 1800.1 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 1804.5 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 1683.7 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON STP fill : 7650.4 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON STNP fill : 1665.6 MB/s (0.7%)
ARM LDP/STP copy : 1677.3 MB/s
ARM STP fill : 7650.2 MB/s (0.2%)
ARM STNP fill : 1668.2 MB/s (0.7%)
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 220.8 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 213.6 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 57.1 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 56.6 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 112.8 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 110.8 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.7 ns
131072 : 6.9 ns / 10.6 ns
262144 : 8.2 ns / 11.9 ns
524288 : 16.3 ns / 26.8 ns
1048576 : 89.5 ns / 137.7 ns
2097152 : 132.1 ns / 178.6 ns
4194304 : 158.8 ns / 199.2 ns
8388608 : 173.3 ns / 208.9 ns
16777216 : 181.5 ns / 215.8 ns
33554432 : 185.9 ns / 219.7 ns
67108864 : 188.7 ns / 222.7 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.6 ns
131072 : 6.9 ns / 10.6 ns
262144 : 8.2 ns / 11.8 ns
524288 : 9.9 ns / 13.9 ns
1048576 : 89.2 ns / 137.7 ns
2097152 : 131.3 ns / 177.5 ns
4194304 : 152.7 ns / 190.6 ns
8388608 : 163.2 ns / 195.3 ns
16777216 : 168.4 ns / 197.2 ns
33554432 : 170.9 ns / 198.1 ns
67108864 : 172.1 ns / 198.5 ns
Executing benchmark on cpu4 (Cortex-A72):
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 3217.2 MB/s
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 3221.3 MB/s (0.3%)
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 3220.3 MB/s
C copy : 3133.9 MB/s
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 3122.6 MB/s (0.2%)
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 3122.3 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 2925.8 MB/s (0.2%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2962.6 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2963.6 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill : 7641.2 MB/s (0.8%)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 7653.4 MB/s (0.5%)
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 7667.2 MB/s (0.3%)
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 7640.6 MB/s (0.2%)
---
standard memcpy : 3113.0 MB/s (0.3%)
standard memset : 7644.1 MB/s (0.3%)
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 3136.0 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 3118.6 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 3119.9 MB/s (0.5%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 3116.9 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 3120.5 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 3134.7 MB/s
NEON STP fill : 7638.5 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON STNP fill : 7592.4 MB/s (0.6%)
ARM LDP/STP copy : 3135.9 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM STP fill : 7645.0 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM STNP fill : 7593.5 MB/s (3.8%)
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 659.0 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 637.5 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 756.3 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 691.0 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 467.8 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 491.0 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.0 ns / 6.4 ns
131072 : 6.1 ns / 8.6 ns
262144 : 8.8 ns / 11.4 ns
524288 : 10.2 ns / 13.1 ns
1048576 : 23.4 ns / 37.7 ns
2097152 : 102.2 ns / 154.2 ns
4194304 : 144.3 ns / 192.3 ns
8388608 : 169.7 ns / 209.6 ns
16777216 : 181.9 ns / 220.4 ns
33554432 : 188.7 ns / 227.1 ns
67108864 : 200.2 ns / 245.5 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.0 ns / 6.4 ns
131072 : 6.0 ns / 8.6 ns
262144 : 7.1 ns / 9.4 ns
524288 : 7.6 ns / 9.8 ns
1048576 : 13.7 ns / 20.7 ns
2097152 : 99.1 ns / 151.6 ns
4194304 : 139.9 ns / 189.1 ns
8388608 : 159.3 ns / 201.0 ns
16777216 : 168.5 ns / 203.4 ns
33554432 : 173.6 ns / 206.0 ns
67108864 : 177.9 ns / 208.0 ns
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on each cluster individually
OpenSSL 1.1.1k, built on 25 Mar 2021
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-128-cbc 98891.71k 314432.30k 670334.72k 975439.19k 1123393.54k 1132937.22k
aes-128-cbc 361931.43k 851287.79k 1271654.57k 1424589.14k 1505572.18k 1509184.85k
aes-192-cbc 94710.23k 283833.79k 558540.20k 758971.05k 847216.64k 854092.46k
aes-192-cbc 339220.14k 780483.86k 1076843.52k 1265476.27k 1331347.46k 1332445.18k
aes-256-cbc 92621.60k 264989.67k 490591.23k 638563.33k 699954.52k 704604.84k
aes-256-cbc 328864.83k 716213.33k 999350.02k 1093035.35k 1142491.82k 1139348.82k
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu0 (Cortex-A53)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3863 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 863 100 841 840 | 16585 100 1416 1416
23: 814 100 830 830 | 16250 100 1407 1407
24: 774 100 833 833 | 15893 100 1395 1395
25: 723 100 826 826 | 15480 100 1378 1378
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 832 832 | 100 1399 1399
Tot: 100 1116 1116
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu4 (Cortex-A72)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3863 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 1666 100 1621 1621 | 25312 100 2161 2161
23: 1543 100 1572 1572 | 24815 100 2148 2148
24: 1454 100 1563 1563 | 24286 100 2132 2132
25: 1348 100 1540 1540 | 23644 100 2104 2104
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 1574 1574 | 100 2136 2136
Tot: 100 1855 1855
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark 3 times multi-threaded
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 64000000 - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3863 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 1323 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 5289 574 897 5145 | 100058 517 1649 8533
23: 4929 568 884 5022 | 97573 517 1633 8443
24: 4674 581 866 5026 | 95170 517 1615 8353
25: 4377 580 863 4999 | 92612 518 1590 8242
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 575 877 5048 | 518 1622 8393
Tot: 546 1250 6720
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3863 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 1323 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 5184 554 910 5044 | 99993 518 1645 8528
23: 4885 562 885 4978 | 97514 517 1631 8438
24: 4609 565 877 4956 | 95145 518 1612 8351
25: 4228 551 876 4828 | 91919 516 1586 8180
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 558 887 4952 | 517 1619 8374
Tot: 538 1253 6663
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 3863 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 1323 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 5160 541 927 5020 | 99890 519 1642 8519
23: 4683 536 890 4772 | 97283 517 1630 8418
24: 4569 551 892 4913 | 95360 521 1606 8370
25: 4359 574 867 4978 | 92625 518 1590 8243
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 551 894 4921 | 519 1617 8387
Tot: 535 1255 6654
Compression: 5048,4952,4921
Decompression: 8393,8374,8387
Total: 6720,6663,6654
##########################################################################
Testing clockspeeds again. System health now:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
11:58:14: 2016/1512MHz 6.01 92% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 68.9°C
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu3 (Cortex-A53):
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1495 (1492.074/1546.932/1491.351)
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1405 (1402.794/1404.702/1361.011)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 660 (656.417/1349.096/1187.200)
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 1000 (997.615/998.651/995.368)
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 805 (804.385/806.721/808.062)
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 570 (569.335/591.313/590.706)
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 340 (338.353/402.796/402.460)
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu4-cpu5 (Cortex-A72):
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2015 (2010.155/2022.144/2010.766)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1010 (1007.972/1507.919/1536.927)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1450 (1449.596/1534.268/1435.081)
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1415 (1411.674/1413.992/1413.420)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1055 (1050.746/1197.674/705.390)
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 1010 (1005.663/634.267/1005.602)
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 815 (813.323/815.257/814.252)
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 600 (598.303/526.380/398.920)
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 200 (197.240/328.362/406.360)
##########################################################################
Thermal source: /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/ (cpu)
System health while running tinymembench:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
11:31:22: 2016/1512MHz 1.70 11% 3% 4% 0% 2% 1% 45.6°C
11:32:42: 2016/1512MHz 1.24 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 46.9°C
11:34:02: 2016/1512MHz 1.14 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
11:35:22: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
11:36:43: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
11:38:03: 2016/1512MHz 1.01 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
11:39:23: 2016/1512MHz 1.11 17% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 45.0°C
11:40:43: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 54.4°C
11:42:03: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 55.0°C
11:43:23: 2016/1512MHz 1.07 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 50.6°C
11:44:43: 2016/1512MHz 1.02 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
11:46:03: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 51.1°C
11:47:23: 2016/1512MHz 1.12 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
System health while running OpenSSL benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
11:48:08: 2016/1512MHz 1.05 13% 2% 8% 0% 1% 0% 49.4°C
11:48:24: 2016/1512MHz 1.04 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:48:40: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 57.8°C
11:48:56: 2016/1512MHz 1.02 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.8°C
11:49:12: 2016/1512MHz 1.02 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 57.8°C
11:49:28: 2016/1512MHz 1.01 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.8°C
11:49:44: 2016/1512MHz 1.01 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 58.3°C
System health while running 7-zip single core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
11:49:56: 2016/1512MHz 1.01 13% 2% 9% 0% 1% 0% 52.8°C
11:50:08: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.1°C
11:50:20: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.1°C
11:50:32: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:50:44: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.1°C
11:50:56: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.1°C
11:51:08: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:51:20: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:51:32: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:51:44: 2016/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:51:57: 2016/1512MHz 1.08 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:52:09: 2016/1512MHz 1.06 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
11:52:21: 2016/1512MHz 1.05 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 53.3°C
11:52:33: 2016/1512MHz 1.04 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 53.9°C
11:52:45: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 55.0°C
11:52:57: 2016/1512MHz 1.03 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 55.6°C
11:53:09: 2016/1512MHz 1.02 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 54.4°C
11:53:21: 2016/1512MHz 1.02 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 53.3°C
11:53:33: 2016/1512MHz 1.01 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 56.1°C
System health while running 7-zip multi core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
11:53:34: 2016/1512MHz 1.01 13% 2% 9% 0% 1% 0% 53.9°C
11:53:45: 2016/1512MHz 1.93 96% 1% 94% 0% 0% 0% 63.8°C
11:53:55: 2016/1512MHz 2.23 81% 0% 81% 0% 0% 0% 62.5°C
11:54:07: 2016/1512MHz 2.81 97% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 65.0°C
11:54:16: 2016/1512MHz 3.40 80% 1% 79% 0% 0% 0% 62.5°C
11:54:29: 2016/1512MHz 3.87 97% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 65.0°C
11:54:38: 2016/1512MHz 4.36 76% 1% 75% 0% 0% 0% 61.9°C
11:54:47: 2016/1512MHz 4.57 99% 2% 97% 0% 0% 0% 60.0°C
11:54:56: 2016/1512MHz 5.10 98% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 61.2°C
11:55:06: 2016/1512MHz 5.24 91% 1% 89% 0% 0% 0% 65.6°C
11:55:15: 2016/1512MHz 5.14 84% 1% 83% 0% 0% 0% 63.8°C
11:55:24: 2016/1512MHz 5.27 94% 0% 94% 0% 0% 0% 67.2°C
11:55:36: 2016/1512MHz 5.53 80% 1% 78% 0% 0% 0% 65.6°C
11:55:47: 2016/1512MHz 5.44 82% 0% 82% 0% 0% 0% 63.8°C
11:55:56: 2016/1512MHz 5.68 97% 2% 95% 0% 0% 0% 63.1°C
11:56:05: 2016/1512MHz 5.73 93% 0% 93% 0% 0% 0% 66.7°C
11:56:14: 2016/1512MHz 5.48 73% 2% 71% 0% 0% 0% 65.0°C
11:56:23: 2016/1512MHz 5.80 99% 2% 97% 0% 0% 0% 62.5°C
11:56:34: 2016/1512MHz 5.89 84% 2% 81% 0% 0% 0% 65.6°C
11:56:43: 2016/1512MHz 5.99 84% 0% 84% 0% 0% 0% 60.0°C
11:56:54: 2016/1512MHz 5.78 90% 1% 89% 0% 0% 0% 67.8°C
11:57:04: 2016/1512MHz 5.98 82% 0% 81% 0% 0% 0% 66.1°C
11:57:15: 2016/1512MHz 5.69 95% 1% 93% 0% 0% 0% 68.3°C
11:57:24: 2016/1512MHz 5.59 78% 1% 76% 0% 0% 0% 65.0°C
11:57:35: 2016/1512MHz 5.73 92% 1% 90% 0% 0% 0% 67.2°C
11:57:45: 2016/1512MHz 5.45 75% 0% 74% 0% 0% 0% 65.6°C
11:57:54: 2016/1512MHz 5.84 99% 2% 97% 0% 0% 0% 65.6°C
11:58:03: 2016/1512MHz 6.01 99% 1% 97% 0% 0% 0% 62.5°C
11:58:14: 2016/1512MHz 6.01 92% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 68.9°C
##########################################################################
Linux 5.10.63-rockchip64 (nanopim4v2) 01/17/22 _aarch64_ (6 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
16.85 0.01 2.61 1.29 0.00 79.25
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk1 44.50 128.45 1149.90 17432.90 420697 3766080 57095196
zram0 0.17 0.69 0.00 0.00 2272 4 0
zram1 0.57 0.65 7.98 0.00 2136 26148 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3.8Gi 246Mi 3.3Gi 9.0Mi 212Mi 3.4Gi
Swap: 1.9Gi 0B 1.9Gi
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram0 partition 1978052 0 5
CPU sysfs topology (clusters, cpufreq members, clockspeeds)
cpufreq min max
CPU cluster policy speed speed core type
0 0 0 408 1512 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
1 0 0 408 1512 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
2 0 0 408 1512 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
3 0 0 408 1512 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
4 1 4 408 2016 Cortex-A72 / r0p2
5 1 4 408 2016 Cortex-A72 / r0p2
Architecture: aarch64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 6
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-5
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 3
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: ARM
Model: 4
Model name: Cortex-A53
Stepping: r0p4
CPU max MHz: 2016.0000
CPU min MHz: 408.0000
BogoMIPS: 48.00
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-5
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Flags: fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 cpuid
Compiler: /usr/bin/gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6/aarch64-linux-gnu)
Userland: arm64
Kernel: 5.10.63-rockchip64/aarch64
CONFIG_HZ=250
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
| FriendlyElec NanoPi M4 Ver2.0 | 2016/1512 MHz | 5.10 | Bullseye arm64 | 6680 | 230410 | 921980 | 3110 | 7640 | - |