-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
/
1oib.txt
844 lines (752 loc) · 40.2 KB
/
1oib.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
sbc-bench v0.6.1 FriendlyElec NanoPi NEO4 (Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:27:06 +0000)
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch)
Release: 9.5
Codename: stretch
Armbian release info:
BOARD=nanopineo4
BOARD_NAME="Nanopi NEO4"
BOARDFAMILY=rk3399
VERSION=5.60
LINUXFAMILY=rk3399
BRANCH=default
ARCH=arm64
IMAGE_TYPE=stable
BOARD_TYPE=conf
INITRD_ARCH=arm64
KERNEL_IMAGE_TYPE=Image
/usr/bin/gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) 6.3.0 20170516
Uptime: 13:27:07 up 7 min, 2 users, load average: 0.97, 0.59, 0.29
Linux 4.4.156-rk3399 (nanopineo-shim) 10/04/18 _aarch64_ (6 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
5.38 0.00 3.83 0.28 0.00 90.51
Device: tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn
mmcblk0 15.45 611.59 393.65 257037 165444
zram0 2.86 1.75 9.68 736 4068
zram1 0.71 2.85 0.01 1196 4
zram2 0.71 2.85 0.01 1196 4
zram3 0.71 2.85 0.01 1196 4
zram4 0.71 2.85 0.01 1196 4
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 919M 70M 466M 8.1M 382M 762M
Swap: 459M 0B 459M
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram1 partition 117744 0 5
/dev/zram2 partition 117744 0 5
/dev/zram3 partition 117744 0 5
/dev/zram4 partition 117744 0 5
##########################################################################
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu3:
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1501.949/1500.693/1501.705
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1405.956/1406.293/1406.308
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1190.058/1190.552/1189.990
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 998.519/998.350/998.169
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 806.406/806.337/806.209
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 589.974/590.271/586.937
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 397.128/398.263/397.203
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu4-cpu5:
Cpufreq OPP: 1992 Measured: 1985.273/1984.809/1984.931
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1793.710/1792.256/1792.814
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1600.979/1599.809/1600.404
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1408.118/1408.963/1408.901
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1193.399/1193.178/1192.889
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 1000.429/1001.241/1000.380
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 808.694/808.783/809.041
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 592.307/592.207/592.293
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 400.147/400.194/400.194
##########################################################################
Executing tinymembench on a little core:
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 1254.8 MB/s (0.8%)
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 1265.3 MB/s (0.5%)
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 1269.6 MB/s (0.5%)
C copy : 1262.1 MB/s (0.4%)
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 996.2 MB/s
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1143.3 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 1173.8 MB/s (0.1%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 843.8 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 657.3 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill : 4625.2 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4626.4 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4625.9 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4624.5 MB/s
---
standard memcpy : 1305.4 MB/s
standard memset : 4629.7 MB/s
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 1305.4 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 924.7 MB/s (0.5%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 1132.3 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 1468.5 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 1468.2 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 1296.4 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON STP fill : 4629.8 MB/s
NEON STNP fill : 1496.6 MB/s (1.5%)
ARM LDP/STP copy : 1307.5 MB/s
ARM STP fill : 4629.9 MB/s
ARM STNP fill : 1555.0 MB/s (4.1%)
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 97.5 MB/s (3.2%)
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 86.0 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 23.6 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 22.8 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 45.3 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 44.6 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.1 ns / 0.1 ns
65536 : 4.6 ns / 7.7 ns
131072 : 7.1 ns / 10.6 ns
262144 : 8.4 ns / 11.9 ns
524288 : 30.8 ns / 47.5 ns
1048576 : 219.1 ns / 338.5 ns
2097152 : 311.1 ns / 427.8 ns
4194304 : 357.7 ns / 463.0 ns
8388608 : 381.0 ns / 479.3 ns
16777216 : 386.1 ns / 474.5 ns
33554432 : 398.0 ns / 492.7 ns
67108864 : 403.9 ns / 489.3 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.1 ns / 0.1 ns
65536 : 4.6 ns / 7.7 ns
131072 : 7.0 ns / 10.7 ns
262144 : 8.4 ns / 11.8 ns
524288 : 30.4 ns / 45.6 ns
1048576 : 217.2 ns / 335.2 ns
2097152 : 307.4 ns / 422.0 ns
4194304 : 347.8 ns / 453.0 ns
8388608 : 366.9 ns / 465.6 ns
16777216 : 376.4 ns / 471.2 ns
33554432 : 381.1 ns / 473.9 ns
67108864 : 383.5 ns / 406.9 ns
Executing tinymembench on a big core:
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 2247.5 MB/s
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2243.1 MB/s
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2225.2 MB/s
C copy : 2224.2 MB/s
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2202.8 MB/s
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2200.8 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 2022.0 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2034.7 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2033.7 MB/s
C fill : 4767.1 MB/s (0.3%)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4764.4 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4766.4 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4772.4 MB/s (1.3%)
---
standard memcpy : 2234.4 MB/s
standard memset : 4771.1 MB/s (0.3%)
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 2240.9 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2231.5 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2230.7 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2199.8 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2199.1 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2238.7 MB/s
NEON STP fill : 4765.7 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON STNP fill : 4736.7 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy : 2240.8 MB/s
ARM STP fill : 4766.8 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM STNP fill : 4736.9 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 651.5 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 563.4 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 708.7 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 574.8 MB/s (1.2%)
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 463.5 MB/s (3.5%)
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 459.3 MB/s (0.1%)
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.1 ns / 6.5 ns
131072 : 6.2 ns / 8.7 ns
262144 : 9.0 ns / 11.6 ns
524288 : 10.4 ns / 13.3 ns
1048576 : 21.5 ns / 34.1 ns
2097152 : 218.9 ns / 348.2 ns
4194304 : 308.6 ns / 441.1 ns
8388608 : 356.4 ns / 488.9 ns
16777216 : 302.4 ns / 418.6 ns
33554432 : 393.5 ns / 518.8 ns
67108864 : 342.6 ns / 477.6 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.1 ns / 6.5 ns
131072 : 6.2 ns / 8.7 ns
262144 : 7.2 ns / 9.5 ns
524288 : 7.8 ns / 9.9 ns
1048576 : 18.5 ns / 29.4 ns
2097152 : 217.1 ns / 347.1 ns
4194304 : 186.4 ns / 316.3 ns
8388608 : 344.8 ns / 468.6 ns
16777216 : 365.2 ns / 481.4 ns
33554432 : 375.6 ns / 488.5 ns
67108864 : 382.4 ns / 493.0 ns
##########################################################################
OpenSSL 1.1.0f, built on 25 May 2017
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-128-cbc 103366.22k 326133.89k 683586.90k 979250.18k 1118778.71k 1130288.47k
aes-128-cbc 342621.36k 855561.60k 1263228.84k 1400367.79k 1487863.81k 1493079.38k
aes-192-cbc 98771.26k 293434.18k 565733.80k 759853.74k 843535.70k 849947.31k
aes-192-cbc 335661.52k 798613.27k 1062101.93k 1246531.93k 1305545.39k 1310135.64k
aes-256-cbc 96386.19k 273021.99k 495674.20k 638784.85k 696808.79k 697718.10k
aes-256-cbc 311135.55k 708827.67k 985984.77k 1071937.88k 1121965.40k 1121381.03k
##########################################################################
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 1483 1496 1493 1502 1501 1502 1501 1502 1502
RAM size: 919 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 675 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 466 100 454 453 | 14378 100 1226 1226
23: 442 100 451 451 | 13859 100 1200 1199
24: 416 100 448 448 | 13337 100 1171 1171
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 451 451 | 100 1199 1199
Tot: 100 825 825
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 1982 1985 1985 1983 1984 1984 1984 1984 1984
RAM size: 919 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 675 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 1039 100 1012 1012 | 20979 100 1790 1789
23: 811 100 827 827 | 20217 100 1751 1749
24: 912 100 981 981 | 19399 100 1704 1703
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 940 940 | 100 1748 1747
Tot: 100 1344 1343
##########################################################################
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 1787 1979 1974 1979 1982 1984 1984 1984 1984
RAM size: 919 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 675 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4456 505 859 4335 | 91804 515 1519 7829
23: 4019 475 862 4095 | 91999 524 1521 7961
24: 4105 524 843 4415 | 86147 519 1458 7561
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 501 855 4281 | 519 1499 7784
Tot: 510 1177 6033
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 1983 1984 1980 1984 1984 1984 1984 1984 1984
RAM size: 919 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 675 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4334 481 876 4217 | 92555 519 1520 7893
23: 4167 493 862 4246 | 90006 521 1496 7788
24: 4085 521 844 4393 | 87696 524 1469 7697
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 498 861 4285 | 521 1495 7793
Tot: 510 1178 6039
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 1984 1985 1982 1984 1985 1984 1985 1985 1985
RAM size: 919 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 675 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4250 467 886 4135 | 92313 518 1521 7873
23: 4001 478 854 4077 | 89520 517 1498 7746
24: 4173 535 839 4487 | 88845 522 1493 7798
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 493 859 4233 | 519 1504 7806
Tot: 506 1182 6019
Compression: 4281,4285,4233
Decompression: 7784,7793,7806
Total: 6033,6039,6019
##########################################################################
** cpuminer-multi 1.3.3 by tpruvot@github **
BTC donation address: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd (tpruvot)
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] 6 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] CPU #2: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:03] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:08] Total: 8.55 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:13] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:18] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:23] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:28] Total: 8.55 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] CPU #5: 2.04 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] Total: 8.53 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:33] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:38] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:43] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:48] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] CPU #5: 2.06 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] CPU #4: 2.05 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:53] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:07:58] Total: 8.55 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] CPU #4: 2.06 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:03] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:08] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:13] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:18] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] CPU #4: 2.03 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:23] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:28] Total: 8.53 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:33] CPU #2: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:38] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:43] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:48] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] CPU #4: 2.05 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] CPU #5: 2.04 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:53] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:08:58] Total: 8.54 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:03] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:08] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:13] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:18] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] CPU #5: 2.02 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:23] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:28] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:33] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:38] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:43] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:48] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] CPU #5: 2.06 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] CPU #4: 2.04 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:53] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:09:58] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:03] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:08] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] CPU #4: 2.06 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] CPU #5: 2.06 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:13] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:18] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] CPU #5: 2.05 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] Total: 8.55 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:23] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:28] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:33] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:38] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] CPU #5: 2.04 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] Total: 8.54 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:43] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:48] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:53] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:10:58] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:03] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:08] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] CPU #5: 2.06 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] CPU #4: 2.04 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:13] CPU #2: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:18] Total: 8.53 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:23] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:28] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:33] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:38] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] Total: 8.56 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] CPU #4: 2.03 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] CPU #0: 1.09 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:43] CPU #2: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:48] Total: 8.52 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] CPU #4: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] CPU #5: 2.07 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] Total: 8.57 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] CPU #1: 1.12 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] CPU #0: 1.10 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] CPU #3: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:53] CPU #2: 1.11 kH/s
[2018-10-04 14:11:58] Total: 8.57 kH/s
Total Scores: 8.57,8.56,8.55,8.54,8.53,8.52
##########################################################################
Testing clockspeeds again. System health now:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
14:11:44: 1992/1512MHz 6.26 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 82.8°C
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu3:
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1502.054/1502.264/1499.821
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1406.109/1406.293/1406.201
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1190.017/1189.168/1189.921
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 996.845/998.277/998.181
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 806.170/806.042/806.101
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 590.198/590.343/590.363
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 398.427/398.493/398.231
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu4-cpu5:
Cpufreq OPP: 1992 Measured: 1984.955/1985.248/1985.150
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1792.216/1793.092/1792.973
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1599.968/1601.198/1601.158
Cpufreq OPP: 1416 Measured: 1408.317/1409.178/1409.009
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1192.999/1193.027/1192.738
Cpufreq OPP: 1008 Measured: 1001.047/1000.489/1001.095
Cpufreq OPP: 816 Measured: 809.070/809.169/809.150
Cpufreq OPP: 600 Measured: 592.021/592.035/592.307
Cpufreq OPP: 408 Measured: 399.660/400.175/400.014
##########################################################################
System health while running tinymembench:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
13:27:19: 1992/1512MHz 0.98 9% 2% 5% 0% 0% 1% 41.7°C
13:29:19: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 41.1°C
13:31:19: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 41.1°C
13:33:19: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 40.6°C
13:35:19: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 41.1°C
13:37:19: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 40.6°C
13:39:20: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 40.0°C
13:41:20: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 40.6°C
13:43:22: 1992/1512MHz 1.07 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.0°C
13:45:23: 1992/1512MHz 1.02 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
13:47:23: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
13:49:23: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.0°C
13:51:23: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
13:53:23: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
System health while running OpenSSL benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
13:55:17: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 15% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 46.9°C
13:55:27: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
13:55:38: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.8°C
13:55:48: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.8°C
13:55:58: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
13:56:08: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
13:56:18: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.8°C
13:56:28: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 49.4°C
13:56:38: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 45.6°C
13:56:48: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48.1°C
13:56:58: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 49.4°C
System health while running 7-zip single core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
13:57:06: 1992/1512MHz 1.00 15% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
13:58:06: 1992/1512MHz 3.43 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
13:59:06: 1992/1512MHz 3.89 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
14:00:06: 1992/1512MHz 4.36 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 44.4°C
14:01:06: 1992/1512MHz 3.81 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 43.9°C
14:02:06: 1992/1512MHz 4.69 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 46.2°C
14:03:06: 1992/1512MHz 4.82 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 46.9°C
14:04:06: 1992/1512MHz 4.60 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 47.5°C
System health while running 7-zip multi core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
14:04:56: 1992/1512MHz 5.16 15% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 48.1°C
14:05:18: 1992/1512MHz 5.19 78% 1% 77% 0% 0% 0% 58.9°C
14:05:38: 1992/1512MHz 5.17 82% 1% 80% 0% 0% 0% 57.8°C
14:06:00: 1992/1512MHz 5.54 77% 1% 76% 0% 0% 0% 60.0°C
14:06:20: 1992/1512MHz 5.42 82% 1% 80% 0% 0% 0% 60.0°C
14:06:43: 1992/1512MHz 4.90 76% 1% 75% 0% 0% 0% 61.2°C
System health while running cpuminer:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
14:07:03: 1992/1512MHz 4.76 18% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 57.8°C
14:07:29: 1992/1512MHz 5.12 99% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 67.8°C
14:07:57: 1992/1512MHz 5.53 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 69.4°C
14:08:25: 1992/1512MHz 5.83 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 71.1°C
14:08:54: 1992/1512MHz 6.06 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 72.8°C
14:09:22: 1992/1512MHz 6.16 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 73.9°C
14:09:50: 1992/1512MHz 6.26 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 76.2°C
14:10:19: 1992/1512MHz 6.27 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 78.1°C
14:10:47: 1992/1512MHz 6.23 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 79.4°C
14:11:16: 1992/1512MHz 6.25 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 80.6°C
14:11:44: 1992/1512MHz 6.26 100% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 82.8°C
##########################################################################
Linux 4.4.156-rk3399 (nanopineo-shim) 10/04/18 _aarch64_ (6 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
25.62 0.01 0.70 0.04 0.00 73.63
Device: tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn
mmcblk0 2.16 84.13 53.29 263253 166748
zram0 0.39 0.24 1.33 736 4152
zram1 0.26 0.39 0.64 1224 1996
zram2 0.26 0.40 0.64 1248 1996
zram3 0.26 0.39 0.64 1232 1996
zram4 0.26 0.40 0.64 1264 1992
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 919M 69M 691M 4.1M 158M 769M
Swap: 459M 7.7M 452M
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram1 partition 117744 1984 5
/dev/zram2 partition 117744 1980 5
/dev/zram3 partition 117744 1976 5
/dev/zram4 partition 117744 1960 5
Architecture: aarch64
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 6
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-5
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 3
Socket(s): 2
Model: 4
CPU max MHz: 1512.0000
CPU min MHz: 408.0000
BogoMIPS: 48.00
Flags: fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32