Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish to crates.io #1

Open
2-complex opened this issue May 24, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Publish to crates.io #1

2-complex opened this issue May 24, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@2-complex
Copy link
Contributor

2-complex commented May 24, 2020

I'd like to be able to appeal to a version with file objects as a crates.io crate : )

@TheSven73
Copy link
Owner

Sounds good! I'm in the middle of a sprint right now - I should be able to do this in a few days.

@TheSven73 TheSven73 self-assigned this May 25, 2020
@2-complex
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks so much : ) Also, I really appreciate all the work you've put into this project. It's useful and nifty!

@TheSven73
Copy link
Owner

Glad it's useful :) Before I push this to crates.io, I need to find a good name for the project. Names like filesystem-rs and file-objects-rs don't describe the lib very well at all - they don't make it clear that this is an in-memory fs for testing.

What would be better? fake-files? mem-files? mem-fs ?

@Kixunil @2-complex any ideas?

@Kixunil
Copy link

Kixunil commented May 28, 2020

I think abstract-fs would convey the point well. Possibly add the word "mock" somewhere in the description too.

@2-complex
Copy link
Contributor Author

I like all those names; I slightly prefer a name that suggests abstraction rather than in-memory implementation. abstract-fs seems pretty on-the-nose : )

@TheSven73
Copy link
Owner

@2-complex do you have access to a Windows PC? I wonder how many tests will fail on Windows. I haven't owned a Windows PC in over 12 years...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants