Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Passive Sync can zap a node after an upgrade if the active has some changes before its upgrade that the passive don't have #915

Open
mathieucarbou opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member

S == setting change
U == upgrade
A == activation

and we have:

A: A S1 S2 U S3 (online)
P: A S1 S2 U S3 (online)
P: A S1 (offline)

Then, we upgrade the kit of last passive and we restart it. It will do:

P: A S1 U => topology won't match active so it will zap
@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member Author

@mobasherul : FYI

@mathieucarbou mathieucarbou removed the bug label Dec 8, 2020
@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member Author

It has been decided to document this problem and ask users to make sure they start all nodes that will be part of the cluster, make sure they are all alive, synced, all have a consistent and up to date configuration.
The upgrade process also is not possible if the configuration is partially prepared, committed or rolled back.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant