Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Searching the source trees as well #47

Open
kberry opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Searching the source trees as well #47

kberry opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request search Searching

Comments

@kberry
Copy link
Contributor

kberry commented Jun 25, 2019

texdoc hyphenex (in current TL) gives:
1 texmf-dist/doc/latex/hyphenat/hyphenat.pdf
2 texmf-dist/doc/latex/hyphenat/README

Both of these are about a different package entirely. I realize it's only one vowel and one consonant different, but ...

Anyway, the problem isn't returning those, which is understandable, but that it fails to find the right file at all, which is:
texmf-dist/source/generic/hyphenex/README

It's in source/ rather than doc/, but that should not stop it from being found (and the exact package name match should make it preferred to anything in a wrong package name). There are lots of README and similar under source/, so it's desirable to look there.

Thanks.

@wtsnjp wtsnjp added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 27, 2019
@e-kwsm
Copy link
Contributor

e-kwsm commented Oct 10, 2019

Sorry, I posted to a different thread.

When a queried package has no doc files, even if they are exactly same, texdoc silently performs fuzzy search and may pick wrong ones (#39 (comment)).

@wtsnjp wtsnjp changed the title texdoc hyphenex fails to find README in source/ Searching the source trees as well Mar 8, 2020
@wtsnjp wtsnjp added the search Searching label Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request search Searching
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants