-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aligned ISO/C++ standardization proposal #5
Comments
Thanks for the link, looks like a huge step forward for C++ tensor interfaces. One question: I couldn't find the justification for the wording in the table in
|
@devinamatthews my reading is that |
The phrasing for My preferred wording for that concept is something like "The difference between the maximum and minimum values of |
I suppose it could be taken as an upper bound, though.
that's how I read it.
My preferred wording for that concept is something like "The difference
between the maximum and minimum values of m(i...), plus one."
This is intended for checking that the domain of `layout` is valid for the
given span (i.e. every multi-index maps to inside the span) ... only the
maximum value of `m(i...)` is needed. What you are propose is best
described by e.g. `domain_size()`
|
There is an ISO/C++ standard proposal in progress which is well-aligned with this effort.
https://github.com/ORNL/cpp-proposals-pub/tree/master/P0009
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: