@Property on member variable instead of getter/setter

[oeil]

Hi guys,

is there any plans on support annotations (e.g. @Property) at the member variable instead of getter/setters (similar to JPA)? This would provide a much better overall experience in Java as well as Kotlin.

Thanks,

[freemo]

That would change the architecture significantly. you would have to pull out objects, modify them, then submit them back to get updated (like you do in jpa). In our current model when you call the setter it calls back to the underlying tinkerpop object.

…

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:18 PM EYL Francois ***@***.***> wrote: Hi guys, is there any plans on support annotations (e.g. @Property <https://github.com/property>) at the member variable instead of getter/setters (similar to JPA)? This would provide a much better overall experience in Java as well as Kotlin. Thanks, — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#51>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC5JAnhJdrRxn0eaNgIn3yi_81T1QRv3ks5uA2oRgaJpZM4U5hl-> .