Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite Download Queue #262

Closed
AriaMoradi opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #437
Closed

Rewrite Download Queue #262

AriaMoradi opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #437

Comments

@AriaMoradi
Copy link
Member

AriaMoradi commented Dec 1, 2021

  • Testable design
  • support operations
    • enqueue
    • unqueue
    • pause/stop
    • re-order
  • use corutines
  • parallel image downloading and smooth percentage
  • parallel download jobs
  • status websocket
@thisisnaveen
Copy link

unqueue is not working properly in WebUI on a recent stable release.

@thisisnaveen
Copy link

re-ordering the downloads also not working properly. Can't give download priority due to this

@Nfivez
Copy link

Nfivez commented Mar 7, 2022

Just curious, but will this be implemented alongside #157?

@AriaMoradi
Copy link
Member Author

Just curious, but will this be implemented alongside #157?

This is a pre-requisite of #157 , auto-download should be a function of clients, I think.

@hwwilliams
Copy link

Just curious, but will this be implemented alongside #157?

This is a pre-requisite of #157 , auto-download should be a function of clients, I think.

Will the auto-download functionality be included in the web UI as well since it is also a client?

@Robonau
Copy link
Contributor

Robonau commented Oct 27, 2022

Will the auto-download functionality be included in the web UI as well since it is also a client?

if someone implements the feature then yes
if no one does then no

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants