-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 865
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please allow to use sub-second time steps #1147
Comments
Thanks for adding your first issue to Stellarium. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. |
I wonder how accurate our satellite position models are, to start with. Has anybody made a thorough analysis and comparison, using the same TLE, between Stellarium's positions and some dedicated service? I assume prediction of satellite occultations require 0.1 arcsec positional accuracy or better. |
I've spent on this last few weeks... It's indeed a complicated subject! And yes, Stellarium is capable to calculate it precisely, but you need to provide it proper TLE data for that. Data downloaded from Celestrak doesn't cut it - you need to provide data with epoch close to the event! The only source for that, for ISS, is NASA, they are providing TLE for epochs ahead. Good lord Stellarium allows to use custom URLs, so I upload the tailored TLE on my server and point Stellarium to it. Simulations have shown good agreement! Though there is another issue... Orbital track is not aligned with ISS itself, opening a bug report on this right now. |
@axd1967 regarding #1130 - interesting! Similar situation with ISS transits... |
Hi, what about this sub-second time steps? I'm using stellarium to catch ISS too and sub-second time steps can help. |
This feature would allow to properly visualize ISS transits (Sun/Moon/planets), as the events of this type are very fast, most of the time below a second. If you want you can hide this feature behind a switch in the configuration.
Currently, the only planetarium capable to do it is KStars (0.1 seconds step is possible), but it has its own set of issues. Also, 0.1 is not enough for planetary transits, would be cool to get 0.001 time step!
Let me know if any additional details are required!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: