Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Planning: const vs immutable #40

Open
LB-- opened this issue Jun 21, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Planning: const vs immutable #40

LB-- opened this issue Jun 21, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@LB--
Copy link
Member

LB-- commented Jun 21, 2016

Const references don't require the referenced value to be immutable.

Once immutable, always immutable.

A const reference can be constructed from any object whether immutable or not.

@LB-- LB-- added the planning label Jun 21, 2016
@LB-- LB-- self-assigned this Jun 21, 2016
@LB--
Copy link
Member Author

LB-- commented Dec 17, 2016

https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/5ipddb/more_const_fewer_bugs/dba2l89/

Perhaps allow moving values by removing them from scope.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant