Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Reduce lock time of schema change in scenarios with a large number of columns (backport #52800) #52842

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Why I'm doing:

This check compatible has a complexity of N^2. In a scenario with many columns (>10000), it will be very slow, causing the table lock to be held for a long time and the import will be stuck.

What I'm doing:

Using hash map to replace the link list.

For a table with 20,000 columns, the lock holding time can be optimized from 12s to 0.8s.

TODO: 0.8s is not reasonable. There is still some optimization points and continuous optimization is needed.

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

This is an automatic backport of pull request #52800 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing:

This check compatible has a complexity of N^2. In a scenario with many columns (>10000), it will be very slow, causing the table lock to be held for a long time and the import will be stuck.

What I'm doing:

Using hash map to replace the link list.

For a table with 20,000 columns, the lock holding time can be optimized from 12s to 0.8s.

TODO: 0.8s is not reasonable. There is still some optimization points and continuous optimization is needed.

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

…arge number of columns (#52800)

Signed-off-by: trueeyu <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f004276)
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git merged commit f2abc0e into branch-3.3 Nov 13, 2024
41 checks passed
@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git deleted the mergify/bp/branch-3.3/pr-52800 branch November 13, 2024 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants