Fix/standardized all references to menu items

[dmitrizagidulin]

What's the consensus on how to indicate menu items (let's say, the right-click menu) in Pillar? In LaTeX, there was a specific menu item tag.
Throughout the book, I've been styling menu items the same as inline classes and methods, like ==Accept it==.
I've also seen bold being used to denote menu items, like ""Accept it"", which I can also see arguments for.

Preferences?

[DamienCassou]

Dmitri Zagidulin [email protected] writes:

What's the consensus on how to indicate menu items (let's say, the right-click menu) in Pillar? In LaTeX, there was a specific menu item tag.
Throughout the book, I've been styling menu items the same as inline classes and methods, like ==Accept it==.
I've also seen bold being used to denote menu items, like ""Accept it"", which I can also see arguments for.

I think we should use ==Item== everywhere. Nothing else.

Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

[dmitrizagidulin]

Sounds good to me.

[dmitrizagidulin]

Consensus is to use the code font Pillar syntax for referencing menu items in the book.
To do:

1. Change bold markup for menu items, like ``""Accept it""to monospace,==Accept it==`.
2. Fix the capitalization, globally. Our menu items are capitalized, that is, ==Do it== instead of ==do it==.