CaptureMode should not override the whole simlucation.json file

[howareyouo]

For example i have a class :

public class ControllerTest  {
  @ClassRule
  public static HoverflyRule hoverflyRule = HoverflyRule.inCaptureMode("simulation.json");

  @Test
  public void reqeustOne() {
      httpClient.get('/url_one')
  }

  @Test
  public void reqeustTwo() {
      httpClient.get('/url_two')
  }
}

If I run test in class level, the result was fine.
And if I run requestOne first then requestTwo after,
only requestTwo will be export to simulation.json file,
hoverfly-java just simply override the existing file, this is not I was expecting.
It should be override/append the content by request mathing described in the docs.

This will be the issue for inCaptureOrSimulateMode as well:
It should be not just detecting the file extists or not, but looking into the content, to see was there a
matched request exists, is it does, simulate it, if not , capturing then append to the json file.

And by the way, great tools, keeping up guys !!

[tommysitu]

Thank you for your feedback! I believe this issue is related to this one: #123

We can perhaps add an option to check existing simulation and append to it when you run a test.

[tommysitu]

An option allowing you to do incremental capture is available in 0.12.1: https://docs.hoverfly.io/projects/hoverfly-java/en/latest/pages/junit4/junit4.html#incremental-capture

[howareyouo]

Just tested it, the enableIncrementalCapture() feature works fine with inCaptureMode, but not compatible with inCaptureOrSimulationMode.

I still have to manually change the code to the inCaptureMode mode when adding new tests.

I was wondering why not add this feature to all these modes once for all ?

[tommysitu]

It requires a change to the core Hoverfly project to do what you wanted. That's why I am keeping this issue open.
You can keep an eye on this one: SpectoLabs/hoverfly#864