Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible wrong access mask in Mimikatz DC Sync rule #4895

Open
ail4ni opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Possible wrong access mask in Mimikatz DC Sync rule #4895

ail4ni opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Work In Progress Some changes are needed

Comments

@ail4ni
Copy link

ail4ni commented Jul 2, 2024

Hi,

I came across a possible bug in one of your rules.

https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/blob/master/rules/windows/builtin/security/win_security_dcsync.yml#L29

The rule didn't match this event 4662. (sorry for the german field names)
grafik

The problem seems to be that the accessmask is specified as a string in the rule. When changing AccessMask: '0x100' to AccessMask: 0x100 the rules matches correctly. I used THOR APT Scanner in version 10.7.12 on a kali linux machine for the scan.

Best regards,
ail4ni

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Welcome @ail4ni 👋

It looks like this is your first issue on the Sigma rules repository!

The following repository accepts issues related to false positives or 'rule ideas'.

If you're reporting an issue related to the pySigma library please consider submitting it here

If you're reporting an issue related to the deprecated sigmac library please consider submitting it here

Thanks for taking the time to open this issue, and welcome to the Sigma community! 😃

@nasbench
Copy link
Member

nasbench commented Jul 2, 2024

Hey @ail4ni thanks for reporting this. Can you export the evtx with this specific log event and share it here. It would be more helpful to debug this.
Thanks.

@nasbench nasbench added the Work In Progress Some changes are needed label Jul 2, 2024
@nasbench nasbench self-assigned this Jul 3, 2024
@ail4ni
Copy link
Author

ail4ni commented Jul 3, 2024

sure, here you go

dcsync.zip

@nasbench nasbench added False-Positive Issue reporting a false positive with one of the rules and removed False-Positive Issue reporting a false positive with one of the rules labels Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Work In Progress Some changes are needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants