-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node 18 incompatible with outdated version of nan #241
Comments
@Shouqun Any input? |
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue. Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue. Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue. Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 10, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 10, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
pipex
added a commit
to balena-os/balena-supervisor
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2023
The node-dbus module is unmaintained and a blocker for the update to Node 18. Switching to our own node bindings for systemd solves this issue Relates-to: Shouqun/node-dbus#241 Change-type: patch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Attempting
npm i
with Node 18 fails with:Whereas
npm i
with Node 16 succeeded without issue. The source of the issue is thatGetContents
was replaced withGetBackingStore
in 2019. After upgradingnan
withnpm i nan@latest
(2.17.0
at time of issue creation),npm i
with Node 18 succeeded. Cannan
be bumped to latest? Looking at the commit innan
whereGetBackingStore
was introduced, there shouldn't be any backwards compatibility issues.EDIT: I tried to make a PR but this repo doesn't seem to allow outside contributors?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: