Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
@dosas that's an interesting idea that I've floated around in the past. As we know there is a large amount of scope that this could encompass, but if we were to add foreman it would likely be assumed that the entire provisioning setup has been done prior to Broker being called. Does this fit in line with what you were thinking? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
I've opened a PR for our broker's draft: #291 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Would you be open to a PR to use foreman as an additional provider?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions