Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modeling perspective update when the metamodels are loaded #262

Open
seyerman opened this issue Sep 25, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Modeling perspective update when the metamodels are loaded #262

seyerman opened this issue Sep 25, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@seyerman
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm submitting a...


[ ] Regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped working in a new release)
[x] Bug report  
[ ] Feature request
[ ] Documentation issue or request
[ ] Improvement request
[ ] Support request => Please do not submit support request here

Current behavior

The behavior is as expected when semantics and syntax metamodels are loaded for the first time because it produces a desired change on the palettes available on the Modeling perspective, but when some different metamodels (syntax and semantics) are loaded for the second time, the Modeling perspective is not updated as expected. The palettes related to the first loaded metamodels remain on the user interface.

Expected behavior

Whenever the syntax and semantic metamodels are loaded, the Modeling perspective must be updated in order to be comply with the metamodels specification.

Minimal reproduction of the problem with instructions

  1. Click on Window file menu -> Show Advanced Perspectives

  2. Click on Semantic and operation Meta-models Perspective

  3. Click on Open icon on tool bar

  4. Choose and load the SEMANTIC metamodel of any paradigm (features, goals, constraint, etc)

  5. Click on Syntax Meta-models Perspective

  6. Click on Open icon on tool bar

  7. Choose and load the SYNTAX metamodel of the same paradigm choosed in step 4.

  8. Click on Modeling Perspective and check the properly visualization

  9. Repeat the steps 1 to 8 for other differente paradigm. In the step 8 you will see the problem.

What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?

Environment

Variamos version:

For Tooling issues:
Platform:
Others:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant