-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ideas thread #5
Comments
The distand chat between gxs which we have now did not exist at this time. Distant chat was between PGP-Keys (or SSL?), and it required an invitation link to start it. Distant chat today works excatly like we want it for rssocialnet. |
I thought that might be the case, good to know. |
RS will possibly be introducing one way authentication once GPG (PGP) has integrated that feature and it's been out in the wild for a bit. |
I'm reading through the thoughts.txt file and I wanted to respond to some things.
I think the mutual friend circle thing is an interesting idea, but I do not think that an explicit message of denial of friendship should be necessary. Perhaps friend requests should time out after a while, and a message should be shown to the one who requested the friendship that no response has been received? I don't know of any services that explicitly announce that you have been denied friendship, or that announce that you've been blocked.
Perhaps instead of walls being passed along only through subscription the profile ids should be passed along like in the People tab on RetroShare, and then posts could be passed along through tunnels. Walls should not be infinite, but should be paginated, or should at least only load as requested. Posts could be shared with the File Sharing system so allow larger posts to be downloaded faster than via direct download from a single peer.
Why can't we use distant chat? I think that all messaging should be handled by RetroShare itself, even if RS SocialNet creates a web ui for those features.
I don't know if this is necessary, or necessarily a good idea. Sharing online/offline status with friends only is good, but shouldn't this information only be shared with friends you trust enough to connect with directly in RetroShare? If included it should be optional.
I think this is a bad idea, because from what I can tell identities are revealed to the network, or at least to Friends-of-Friends. I think a better idea is prompting the user to make an identity, and perhaps having the default identity name as the same as the PGP name, but allow the user to modify it before the GSX-ID is actually created.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: