New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better error diagnostics #17

Open

RanolP opened this issue Feb 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Owner

RanolP commented Feb 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Consider beauty diagnostic reporting crates such as:

ariadne
codespan-reporting
annotate-snippets
language-reporting
miette

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

RanolP mentioned this issue

Open

RanolP changed the title ~~Better error report~~ Better error diagnostics

Owner Author

RanolP commented Mar 1, 2022

I chose quick-xml because

It is a long-lived library
It has more stars than others
Its features are enough for me

But

It is not maintained well. Its latest stable release is about 1 year ago. Also, the repository does not have commits in the past 3 months.
it provides poor support for getting error location when using derive macro. So we cannot use the libraries listed above (but actually this problem is widely shared across various libraries).

So we could consider another library. Maybe we could change the language itself (see #22)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment