Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hydronic Network Sizing #4

Open
MichaMans opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Hydronic Network Sizing #4

MichaMans opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@MichaMans
Copy link
Contributor

We had some utilities functions like the sizing of a hydronic network for heating (and maybe cooling?). Is it planned to reintegrate this or what do you think about such helper functions for the graph framework?
@marcusfuchs

@MichaMans MichaMans added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2018
@marcusfuchs
Copy link

@MichaMans Good question. I am a bit divided on this issue. On the one hand such functions can be helpful. On the other hand, this is a special case when we consider the general graph framework for all possible network types (including e.g. electricity). To me, it seems hard to add this in a general way. Therefore, maybe it should rather be outside the core of the framework? But I also see the advantages of including it for convenience. In any case, unfortunately I currently do not have the bandwidth to work on this topic. Therefore I have no plans in this direction, but I am open to helping with the integration if someone wants to add this.

@MichaMans
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcusfuchs Yeah! Good to know. I find it hard too, but in my opinion it would be a great addition. Of course we should implement this for heating and cooling networks to have a wide spectrum of usage. In general i think the more that tool can provide the better it is for the use of a urban energy systems graph framework. But maybe we'll see it in a different angle in the future. For now I'll try to make a suggestion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants