You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We had some utilities functions like the sizing of a hydronic network for heating (and maybe cooling?). Is it planned to reintegrate this or what do you think about such helper functions for the graph framework? @marcusfuchs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@MichaMans Good question. I am a bit divided on this issue. On the one hand such functions can be helpful. On the other hand, this is a special case when we consider the general graph framework for all possible network types (including e.g. electricity). To me, it seems hard to add this in a general way. Therefore, maybe it should rather be outside the core of the framework? But I also see the advantages of including it for convenience. In any case, unfortunately I currently do not have the bandwidth to work on this topic. Therefore I have no plans in this direction, but I am open to helping with the integration if someone wants to add this.
@marcusfuchs Yeah! Good to know. I find it hard too, but in my opinion it would be a great addition. Of course we should implement this for heating and cooling networks to have a wide spectrum of usage. In general i think the more that tool can provide the better it is for the use of a urban energy systems graph framework. But maybe we'll see it in a different angle in the future. For now I'll try to make a suggestion.
We had some utilities functions like the sizing of a hydronic network for heating (and maybe cooling?). Is it planned to reintegrate this or what do you think about such helper functions for the graph framework?
@marcusfuchs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: