diff --git a/astro-docs/astro.config.mjs b/astro-docs/astro.config.mjs
index 0aaf4a7..7b898b6 100644
--- a/astro-docs/astro.config.mjs
+++ b/astro-docs/astro.config.mjs
@@ -8,15 +8,14 @@ export default defineConfig({
 	integrations: [
 		starlight({
 			title: 'RSNA/ACR Common Data Elements',
-			social: {
-				github: 'https://github.com/withastro/starlight',
-			},
 			sidebar: [
 				{
 					label: 'Guides',
 					items: [
 						// Each item here is one entry in the navigation menu.
 						{ label: 'Authoring and Conventions', slug: 'guides/author' },
+						{ label: 'Review Process', slug: 'guides/review' },
+						{ label: 'Use CDEs in PowerScribe', slug: 'guides/powerscribe'}
 					],
 				},
 				{
diff --git a/astro-docs/src/assets/workflow.png b/astro-docs/src/assets/workflow.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d17878f
Binary files /dev/null and b/astro-docs/src/assets/workflow.png differ
diff --git a/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/powerscribe.md b/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/powerscribe.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fc8e547
--- /dev/null
+++ b/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/powerscribe.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+title: PowerScribe Integration
+---
+
+<video class="w-75 mx-auto" controls=""> 
+    <source src="https://radelement.org/b2be5967e69267940c48.mp4" type="video/mp4"> 
+    <p> Your browser doesn't support HTML video. Here is a 
+    <a href="https://radelement.org/assets/radelements.demo.revised.mp4" download="radelements.demo.revised.mp4">link to the video</a> instead. 
+    </p>
+</video>
+
+Thanks to Andrew Gomella, MD, Aparna Singhal, MD, and Alex J. Towbin, MD for producing this video!
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/review.md b/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/review.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..252a93b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/astro-docs/src/content/docs/guides/review.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+title: CDE review and approval process
+---
+
+The RSNA and ACR review all submitted common data elements. The review process mimics peer-reviewed journal submissions.
+
+The first step of review ensures complete submissions, this is performed by ACR/RSNA staff.
+
+Each set is reviewed by a single reviewer, tasked with evaluting adherance to the [Set](../reference/set), [Element](../reference/element), and [Value](../reference/valueset) standards. Reviewers are asked to limit their input on clinical relevance or applicability to egregious clinical errors, or CDEs where the reviewer believes the author's intent is corrupted. 
+
+Iterations between reviewers and authors are encouraged until the CDE set is ready for editorial approval. Each set is reviewed by an editor who may ask for additional revisions or approve for publishing. As shown below proposed CDE sets are stored to RadElement at several steps along the review process.
+
+A detailed workflow diagram is below.
+
+![CDE Workflow Diagram](../../../assets/workflow.png)