You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discussion in #4886 revealed some distaste for the offset coordinate system used by MapTool for hex grids. (off-q, or off-r)
The improvement you'd like to see
It is suggested to move to cubic coordinates instead of offset.
Expected Benefits
This should simplify the java side coordinate math, since no offset maths would be required any longer, and vectors would just work.
Display coordinates could then be implemented for graphs, allowing for options such as the existing offset system, cubic, or axial.
Also allowing for y-up instead of the current y-down.
Additional Context
Coordinate vector math would also no longer need to care about handling offsets wherever it is - entities dealing with coordinates don't care about the grid and what offset it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the problem
Discussion in #4886 revealed some distaste for the offset coordinate system used by MapTool for hex grids. (off-q, or off-r)
The improvement you'd like to see
It is suggested to move to cubic coordinates instead of offset.
Expected Benefits
This should simplify the java side coordinate math, since no offset maths would be required any longer, and vectors would just work.
Display coordinates could then be implemented for graphs, allowing for options such as the existing offset system, cubic, or axial.
Also allowing for y-up instead of the current y-down.
Additional Context
Coordinate vector math would also no longer need to care about handling offsets wherever it is - entities dealing with coordinates don't care about the grid and what offset it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: