Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nanopublications dataset – future scope #19

Open
Ostrzyciel opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Nanopublications dataset – future scope #19

Ostrzyciel opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
discussion Things to discuss – not necessarily to resolve ASAP
Milestone

Comments

@Ostrzyciel
Copy link
Member

Currently the dataset includes only valid, non-superseded or retracted nanopubs that have a triple like ?s a stax:RdfStreamTypeUsage. This is fine for now, as it corresponds to the template for creating nanopubs with RDF-STaX. However in the future we may consider expanding the scope of this dataset or creating variants of it.

  • Should we include nanopubs that cite the pubs we include? Maybe recursively, using SPARQL path operators?
    • This way we could include a whole discussion "tree" about the nanopubs, making the dataset more complete.
    • Maybe distribute it as a separate dataset version?
  • One could conceivably publish nanopubs matching the current pattern for other applications (like annotating datasets), not only for annotating publications and software (which is the current intended use case). This could potentially dilute the dataset.
    • Maybe we should mark nanopubs with the survey intention in some way?
    • Is this really an issue?
    • Just add a marker or use a filter?
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel added the discussion Things to discuss – not necessarily to resolve ASAP label Nov 16, 2023
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Nov 27, 2023
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel modified the milestones: 1.1.0, 1.2.0 Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Things to discuss – not necessarily to resolve ASAP
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant