We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I cannot find where this 16.33 comes from, it is not consistent with what we have in Julia https://queracomputing.github.io/Bloqade.jl/dev/tutorials/2.adiabatic/main/
16.33
Julia uses the following - if the new number is required by the experiment, then we should explain what it is.
total_time = 2.9 Ω_max = 2π * 4.3 Ω = piecewise_linear(clocks = [0.0, 0.3, 2.6, total_time], values = [0.0, Ω_max, Ω_max, 0]); U = 2π * 15.0 Δ = piecewise_linear(clocks = [0.0, 0.3, 2.6, total_time], values = [-U, -U, U, U]); fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(ncols = 2, figsize = (10, 4)) Bloqade.plot!(ax1, Ω) ax1.set_ylabel("Ω/2π (MHz)") Bloqade.plot!(ax2, Δ) ax2.set_ylabel("Δ/2π (MHz)") fig
plus it would be nice to explain on the units, the pi factor in the pulse parameter etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fixes QuEraComputing#951
f95ced4
No branches or pull requests
I cannot find where this
16.33
comes from, it is not consistent with what we have in Julia https://queracomputing.github.io/Bloqade.jl/dev/tutorials/2.adiabatic/main/Julia uses the following - if the new number is required by the experiment, then we should explain what it is.
plus it would be nice to explain on the units, the pi factor in the pulse parameter etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: