Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

method get_job_by_id() missing in Qiskit Function Intro #2627

Open
johannesgreiner opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2629
Open

method get_job_by_id() missing in Qiskit Function Intro #2627

johannesgreiner opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2629
Assignees
Labels
content request request for new content to be added content 📄

Comments

@johannesgreiner
Copy link
Contributor

URL, if applicable

https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/functions#list-previously-run-jobs-run-with-qiskit-functions

Describe the new content you are requesting.

A Qiskit Function user notified us via the startup providing the related Function that https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/functions#list-previously-run-jobs-run-with-qiskit-functions is missing one or two lines on the functionality to retrieve a job by id, namely catalog.get_job_by_id()

If this new content request is accepted, do you want to write the content?

I can help the team by providing enough information to write the material

@johannesgreiner johannesgreiner added content request request for new content to be added content 📄 needs triage 🤔 this issue needs to be prioritized by the docs team labels Feb 7, 2025
@abbycross
Copy link
Collaborator

@johannesgreiner Thanks for opening the issue! I can open a PR for this and will tag you to guide me on the complete fix to resolve this.

@javabster javabster removed the needs triage 🤔 this issue needs to be prioritized by the docs team label Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content request request for new content to be added content 📄
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants