-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More flexible hydrothermal units #125
Comments
In
|
@jiananf2 why are the products from Hydrocracking/Hydrotreating in gas phase? QSDsan/qsdsan/sanunits/_hydroprocessing.py Line 167 in 9afc033
QSDsan/qsdsan/sanunits/_hydroprocessing.py Line 421 in 9afc033
|
I think I know the reason, it's because of the mass allocation after vle... I'll just set the phase to be the same as the influent oil (g anyway) |
After I changed the names, HXN had an error. This is because the heat is not balanced. The hydrotreating and hydrocracking reactions release heat. I just increased the output temperatures in the current model without modeling the released heat. |
@jiananf2 OK thanks for letting me know, I don't think the costs (not sure of the utilities, I didn't check) were included. |
@jiananf2 FYI, I'm hoping to update the hydrothermal units so that they are more flexible (i.e., not written in the context of sludge/WWTP, not necessarily using the predictive models, etc.). In the future, I probably will move your hydrothermal/hydroprocessing units to the
htl
module in EXPOsan and put the new units (still largely based on your codes) in QSDsan.I'm using this issue to document the changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: