Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue: Connecting block attributes and custom fields #28

Open
paaljoachim opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Tracking issue: Connecting block attributes and custom fields #28

paaljoachim opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@paaljoachim
Copy link

I believe this issue is very interesting!

Tracking issue: Connecting block attributes and custom fields
WordPress/gutenberg#53300

(From the issue...)
This issue is meant to discuss how to connect block attributes with custom/meta fields. It includes a list of tasks needed for this, and we will share updates about the progress here.

While working on this implementation, we realized that the internal API we were using could be useful for other projects like WordPress/gutenberg#53705. Therefore, we decided to create another issue to keep track of the WordPress/gutenberg#54536, which will be used to connect block attributes and custom fields.

Block Bindings API: Internal API to connect block attributes and different sources. Not only used for custom fields but for other projects like WordPress/gutenberg#53705.
Custom Fields: Using the Block Bindings API, support for the "meta_fields" source to connect block attributes and custom fields.

@paaljoachim
Copy link
Author

Here is an older and very long Make WordPress core post from 30 March 2023.
Proposal: The Interactivity API – A better developer experience in building interactive blocks

@paaljoachim
Copy link
Author

Check out:
Epic: Interactivity API - public 1.0 version
WordPress/gutenberg#56803

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant