Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release Pumpkin 1.0.0 #449

Open
Snowiiii opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 6 comments
Open

Release Pumpkin 1.0.0 #449

Snowiiii opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@Snowiiii
Copy link
Member

Snowiiii commented Jan 3, 2025

Roadmap

The Roadmap for the First release of Pumpkin 1.0.0 which is planned this year in 2025 🥳

Alpha
The Alpha is a Test Version made for Developers (or really experienced People) and can contain crashes or critical bugs.

  • Alpha 1: Focus on Feedback and Developer API
  • Alpha 2: First Update with may API Breaking changes and new Features also fixes

Beta
The Beta is a Test Version made for Developers but also people who are Interested in testing the latest tech. This build should not contain any critical bugs or crashes. There will be also only a few new features added since its now polishing time

  • Beta 1 : Initial Beta release, Focus on Feedback from Players
  • Beta 2 : Continue testing and fixing, this is the last API Breaking Update
  • Beta 3 : Near-final builds for final testing.

Final release
Pumpkin 1.0.0 releases to the Public and can be easily downloaded for all Supported Platforms

Supported Platforms

These are the Platforms pumpkin is guaranteed to work on, more Platforms may work with Pumpkin, But are not guaranteed to be supported

  • Windows (10+)
  • Linux (5.15+)
  • Android (API level 21)
  • macOS
  • iOS

Downloads

Prebuild Architectures

  • Arm32/64
  • x86/64

All downloads for all Platforms will be found at https://pumpkinmc.org/

  • Android: Google Play & FDroid
  • Apple: App Store

... more

@suprohub
Copy link
Contributor

suprohub commented Jan 3, 2025

Can you pin issue?

@neeleshpoli
Copy link
Contributor

If we are going to support mobile targets, we might as well also support FreeBSD

@Snowiiii
Copy link
Member Author

Snowiiii commented Jan 3, 2025

If we are going to support mobile targets, we might as well also support FreeBSD

Well, I was thinking of that. But I think that the file locking might be the issue here

@neeleshpoli
Copy link
Contributor

Well, I was thinking of that. But I think that the file locking might be the issue here

Yeah, it might be a problem. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it's a big concern though since the standard library should abstract this away, right?

Also considering that RISC-V is also starting to gain traction, we might also want to offer RISC-V builds for Linux.

@Snowiiii
Copy link
Member Author

Snowiiii commented Jan 4, 2025

Well, I was thinking of that. But I think that the file locking might be the issue here

Yeah, it might be a problem. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it's a big concern though since the standard library should abstract this away, right?

Also considering that RISC-V is also starting to gain traction, we might also want to offer RISC-V builds for Linux.

What do you mean ?, We are using a file-guard for locking. It supports only Windows and Unix.

I was thinking of RISC-V, i have nothing against adding it when its easily done

@neeleshpoli
Copy link
Contributor

What do you mean ?, We are using a file-guard for locking. It supports only Windows and Unix.

Ohh I see. I wasn't aware of that. I looked at the README and am failing to understand what this crate is for. What are we using file-guard for?

I was thinking of RISC-V, i have nothing against adding it when its easily done

👍

@Snowiiii Snowiiii pinned this issue Jan 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants