Review function names

[Jennit07]

I have had this on my list for a while but haven't got round to it or added an issue as this will be a big change. Im adding this and will assign to myself to remember to review this in the new year. Currently we have the name structure set up process_extract_xxx or process_tests_xxx which indicate scripts which have been converted into a function. However this looks a bit confusing when we consider other functions which deal with tests and create test flags for comparison. This is in the format produce_xxx_tests which i think looks too similar to other functions which are not really related. I mentioned before that a proposed rename could be to have this in the format build_tests_xxx which will differentiate this. If anyone has any other rename suggestions for these functions (or others) please comment on this Issue.

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open approximately 5 months with no activity.

[SwiftySalmon]

do we reckon this needs done?? I think most function names are fine... unless there's anything specific that you can think of?