Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sequence writing tests to excel #1013

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

lizihao-anu
Copy link
Contributor

Close #1001

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

_targets.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

This comment has been minimized.

@lizihao-anu
Copy link
Contributor Author

ready for review

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

Unrecognized words (1)

SPSS

Previously acknowledged words that are now absent anomymous datas spss 🫥
To accept these unrecognized words as correct and remove the previously acknowledged and now absent words, you could run the following commands

... in a clone of the [email protected]:Public-Health-Scotland/source-linkage-files.git repository
on the sequence-extracts-tests-writing branch (ℹ️ how do I use this?):

curl -s -S -L 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/main/apply.pl' |
perl - 'https://github.com/Public-Health-Scotland/source-linkage-files/actions/runs/11364344451/attempts/1'

OR

To have the bot accept them for you, reply quoting the following line:
@check-spelling-bot apply updates.

Available 📚 dictionaries could cover words (expected and unrecognized) not in the 📘 dictionary

This includes both expected items (313) from .github/actions/spelling/expect.txt and unrecognized words (1)

Dictionary Entries Covers Uniquely
cspell:fullstack/dict/fullstack.txt 419 3 3
cspell:k8s/dict/k8s.txt 153 4 1
cspell:php/dict/php.txt 1689 4
cspell:node/dict/node.txt 891 3 1
cspell:npm/dict/npm.txt 302 3

Consider adding them (in .github/workflows/spelling.yml) for uses: check-spelling/check-spelling@main in its with:

      with:
        extra_dictionaries:
          cspell:fullstack/dict/fullstack.txt
          cspell:k8s/dict/k8s.txt
          cspell:php/dict/php.txt
          cspell:node/dict/node.txt
          cspell:npm/dict/npm.txt

To stop checking additional dictionaries, add (in .github/workflows/spelling.yml) for uses: check-spelling/check-spelling@main in its with:

check_extra_dictionaries: ''
Pattern suggestions ✂️ (1)

You could add these patterns to .github/actions/spelling/patterns.txt:

# Automatically suggested patterns
# hit-count: 3 file-count: 1
# Compiler flags
(?:^|[\t ,"'`=(])-[DPWXYLlf](?=[A-Z]{2,}|[A-Z][a-z]|[a-z]{2,})

Errors (2)

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
ℹ️ candidate-pattern 1
❌ ignored-expect-variant 3

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Jennit07 Jennit07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We talked through this one and the code looks good. Ready to merge

@Jennit07 Jennit07 merged commit 74947ce into december-2024 Oct 16, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@Jennit07 Jennit07 deleted the sequence-extracts-tests-writing branch October 16, 2024 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants