Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare results across solutions #310

Open
denised opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Compare results across solutions #310

denised opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@denised
Copy link
Member

denised commented Jul 14, 2021

While observing a PD integrations process, I noted that they use charts to give a summary overview of the entire set of solutions at once, as a way of mentally checking that the process was going as expected. The ability to do a sanity check across the whole suite of solutions may be useful in other places as well.
This might primarily be a UI practice, but we could also enable it at the solutions level by providing some pre-built functions and/or Jupyter notebooks.

@denised denised added Python Model Priority 3 "Could have" item. Not critical. Utility labels Jul 14, 2021
@denised denised removed the Priority 3 "Could have" item. Not critical. label Mar 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant