Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we package the workshop material as a "JupyterBook"? #15

Open
hdrake opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Should we package the workshop material as a "JupyterBook"? #15

hdrake opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@hdrake
Copy link
Member

hdrake commented Jan 22, 2020

@brian-rose has just released a re-packaging of the various python notebooks he used as lecture notes for classes and published it as an open-access "JupyterBook".

@ali-ramadhan
Copy link

JupyterBooks look really cool! Didn't know about them.

Journal of Open Source Education (JOSE) might be another avenue of interest. They publish open source educational material (JupyterBooks would qualify I think) but might be more focused on material for "coding to learn" as opposed to "learning to code".

@hdrake
Copy link
Member Author

hdrake commented Jan 22, 2020

I haven't looked into it much yet, but one downside of this approach (and the https://mybinder.org/ approach more generally) is that I haven't yet figured out how (or if it is possible) to have more than one option for binder configurations in a single repository. For example, I had to make a whole separate repository for Lecture04 on big data because the binder configurations for that tutorial are so different from our Lecture01 and Lecture02 binder configurations...

@hdrake
Copy link
Member Author

hdrake commented Jan 23, 2020

@rabernat also just released his open-access textbook, which is formatted fairly differently but also uses jupyterbook: https://earth-env-data-science.github.io/intro.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants