Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to improve the test performance on ScanNet? #34

Open
zymhnu opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

How to improve the test performance on ScanNet? #34

zymhnu opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@zymhnu
Copy link

zymhnu commented Apr 5, 2023

Thanks for sharing. I had some problems when I submitted my testing results to ScanNet. I had a competitive performance on the validation set, such as 74.0% mIoU, but only had a low performance on the test set, like 71.0%mIoU. Moreover, I reproduced ptv2 and got 74.5% mIoU on the validation set, and I only got 71.1%mIoU when submitted to ScanNet.

@haibo-qiu
Copy link

Hi, I share the same concern as I achieved 74.3% on the ScanNet validation set but only managed to obtain 70.6% on the ScanNet test set.

@Gofinge
Copy link
Member

Gofinge commented Apr 17, 2023

I never encounter the same situation. I submitted the benchmark twice, one for 73.x and another is 75.x. We also discussed the phenomenon, and some senior researchers told me that the test result on the ScanNet benchmark is not stable, and the only solution is to try more time.

@zymhnu
Copy link
Author

zymhnu commented Apr 17, 2023

Thank you for your reply. But are there any tricks on the ScanNet test? Or just modify the value of "split"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants