You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an excellent dataset, and I am deeply grateful to the author for making it publicly available. It has been extremely helpful for my work. However, there is a issue that users should be aware of when using this dataset:
The values of SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) images typically range between 6500 and 6600, but since unsigned int can only represent numbers between 0 and 65535, excessively large values will overflow. This causes some of the values to wrap around and fall into the range of 0 to 100.
When visualizing SAR images, this overflow can result in certain areas appearing unusually dark. This is a clear sign of the overflow issue.
Fortunately, this issue is relatively straightforward to address. I resolved it by applying the following processing function to the SAR images:
deflower_upper_bound(x):
# Overflow results in values wrapping around to the range of 0–100.ifx.min() <2000: # Overflow detectedx_t=np.zeros_like(x)
x_t[x>2000] =x[x>2000] -x[x>2000].min() # Shift non-overflowed values downwardx_t[x<=2000] =x[x<=2000] +x_t.max() # Shift overflowed values upwardreturnx_treturnx
This issue may not significantly impact usage, but I think it’s worth highlighting here to ensure a smoother experience when working with this dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is an excellent dataset, and I am deeply grateful to the author for making it publicly available. It has been extremely helpful for my work. However, there is a issue that users should be aware of when using this dataset:
The values of SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) images typically range between 6500 and 6600, but since unsigned int can only represent numbers between 0 and 65535, excessively large values will overflow. This causes some of the values to wrap around and fall into the range of 0 to 100.
When visualizing SAR images, this overflow can result in certain areas appearing unusually dark. This is a clear sign of the overflow issue.
Fortunately, this issue is relatively straightforward to address. I resolved it by applying the following processing function to the SAR images:
This issue may not significantly impact usage, but I think it’s worth highlighting here to ensure a smoother experience when working with this dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: