Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Labels: Be consistent with "middle XXX" versus "mid-XXX" #9

Open
GaelVaroquaux opened this issue Jan 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Labels: Be consistent with "middle XXX" versus "mid-XXX" #9

GaelVaroquaux opened this issue Jan 15, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

The labels are sometimes "middle XXX" ("middle posterior"), sometimes mid-XX "mid-posterior".

We should be consistent with them. I would favor renaming everything to "mid-XXX", to make things shorter.
@antonia-ms
Copy link

The process was if a region had <6 parts in the y-axis, it was anterior/mid-anterior/middle/mid-posterior/posterior. Large regions like the middle temporal gyrus had a lot more subdivisions (11). So the 'middle posterior' was intentional but it seems confusing. Can we improve this?

@KamalakerDadi
Copy link
Collaborator

What is the agreement here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@GaelVaroquaux @KamalakerDadi @antonia-ms