Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Remediation] uo-arch-photos preflight check #1518

Open
5 tasks done
sseymore opened this issue Dec 30, 2021 · 8 comments
Open
5 tasks done

[Remediation] uo-arch-photos preflight check #1518

sseymore opened this issue Dec 30, 2021 · 8 comments

Comments

@sseymore
Copy link
Contributor

sseymore commented Dec 30, 2021

collection_id: uo-arch-photos

Known Issues

  • Bad cpd (Linda and Sarah)
  • Bad dates (Leslie)
  • Bad preds (Linda)
  • Bad URIs (SB)
  • Missing required data (Sarah)

Related Tickets

@sseymore
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cannot remediate these 3. Where are they?

oregondigital:df727n01q missing required field: title
oregondigital:df734956v missing required field: title
oregondigital:df734956v missing required field: identifier

@lsat12357
Copy link
Contributor

lsat12357 commented Jan 24, 2022

oregondigital:df727n01q is now reachable, with a temporary title

oregondigital:df734956v is also now reachable, however I think this one should be deleted.
It was in the list of children for this cpd:
https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df734d94w
however, oregondigital:df734956v's content file appears to be a pdf version of these two assets which are also in the cpd
https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df7349549
https://oregondigital.org/catalog/oregondigital:df734955k

I have already removed oregondigital:df734956v from the cpd; something about its relationship to the parent was borking it. Let me know if I have misdiagnosed the situation though

@sseymore
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseymore commented Feb 2, 2022

oregondigital:df727n01q actually should not have been uploaded. can you delete?

oregondigital:df734956v Agree, delete. We did upload PDFs if there was significant text on the item, but this does not fall into that category.

@lsat12357
Copy link
Contributor

lsat12357 commented Feb 2, 2022

a new twist! the bad cpd oregondigital:df726392p is not actually missing any children, but the children failed to make it on the pidlist bc they're all missing the set. Am adding set to match parent.

@lsat12357
Copy link
Contributor

lsat12357 commented Feb 2, 2022

bad preds:
http://lod.xdams.org/reload/oad/has_FindingAid #fix predicate
http://schema.org/event #fix predicate
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format #remove? value is a string.
is that ok? to remove the statements that use dce format with a string obj?

@lsat12357
Copy link
Contributor

maybe I should make the first couple of passes at fixing bad dates

@sseymore
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseymore commented Feb 3, 2022

Leslie is also helping with the dates, so let me know if you want to takeover. I am almost done with the URI remediation.

@sseymore
Copy link
Contributor Author

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/format #remove? value is a string.
is that ok? to remove the statements that use dce format with a string obj?

Yes, I think so as long as the correct DC URIs are there and have correct expected values.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants