You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Any chance to get concurrent users working, at least to the extent that two can be operating on the same file, even if the tree itself gets clobbered?
Aware this would be a potentially complicated operation given the way it uses conllu output as the way to store updates. Some kind of intermediate step which allows for more finegrained updates? Probably asking users to install a DB is overkill...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've already implemented a thing which avoid double editing of the same tree. If two users use the same server they can edit different sentences concurrently. However if they try to edit the same sentence, the one who saves second gets a warning that somebody else has changed the sentence since the first users loaded the sentence. So trees cannot get clobbered (but all your changes of the current sentence may be lost if somebody modified the sentence quicker than you.
I'd like to keep the tool as "simple" as possible and are hesitating implementing user control and all that which comes with storing partial edits (in particular if they contradictory, if user 1 attaches word 1 to word 2 and user 2 attaches word 1 to word 3 ....
Any chance to get concurrent users working, at least to the extent that two can be operating on the same file, even if the tree itself gets clobbered?
Aware this would be a potentially complicated operation given the way it uses conllu output as the way to store updates. Some kind of intermediate step which allows for more finegrained updates? Probably asking users to install a DB is overkill...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: