-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add economic and geografical potential to the OEO #1973
Comments
Are I'm not sure, if I understand As for |
Maybe it is helpful to provide the current hierarchy and the definitions of flow potential and stock potential: A An A An |
I don't think there is any good way to add We could make an |
I agree. We could think about adding
Again, the context would be helpful. |
These are the definitions where these terms are most prominent:
To me this doesn't really tell if we are talking about flow or stock potential. It sounds like it would mean both. |
Description of the issue
As mentioned in #1968 both economic and geographical potential are terms used in a definition in the new tasks module. Since this not a trivial concept I would like it to be added to the OEO.
@stap-m added some thoughts:
economic potential
would be a "parent" concept foreconomic stock
andflow potential
. We could think about either makingeconomic potential
alternative label to both concepts, or introduce it as equivalent parent class that has both subtypes as children.geographical potential
is probably a special type of theoretical (stock or flow) potential.I fear, we'll have to find sensible ways to define smart parallel hierarchies, if we want to introduce these classes.
Ideas of solution
These are the definitions I proposed:
economic potential
is the potential for economic development.(we already have economic stock potential and economic flow potential in the oeo)
geographical potential
is the potential given by the physical location.Workflow checklist
I am aware that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: