-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add relation between market participant and commodity #1916
Comments
If I understand it correctly, then What is missing is a relation between a commodity and a market participant. Maybe I'm not thinking far enough, but |
Maybe we can get some inspiration from other existing ontologies that deal with markets, or even or reuse existing concepts. @madbkr could take a look whats out there? A starting point to search might be https://terminology.nfdi4ing.de/ts/, you could also check FIBO ontology. Maybe there are others... |
I have not found a lot in other ontologies. I don't think any of this will be the solution to this problem, a new relation seems more reasonable to me. An ontology Ontology of Commercial Exchange (OCE) was suggested 5 years ago but apparently that never happened - or I can't find it. The paper has some thoughts on related topics like this: FIBO: There is no market participant, but there is exchange participant. Again it is used with roles to be part of an exchange (no relations as we are looking for). The only relation even vaguely in the right direction is All Core Ontology (CCO) I found no other ontology that really touched on the concepts we are looking for. |
That is in my view a separate discussion from what we try to solve in this issue. What about a new issue where we introduce the relation between the
market participant
and the commodity offered?Originally posted by @l-emele in #1239 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: